24 June 2020
The NSW Parliament has passed two Acts, introduced by the NSW Government, to address concerns and issues that have arisen over a long period of time with regards to deficiencies in the quality of building and construction work across the state.
The introduction of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act) and the Residential Apartment Buildings (Compliance and Enforcement Powers) Act 2020 (RAB Act) follows the Shergold-Weir Report into the Building and Construction industry in 2018 and the appointment of the first NSW Building Commissioner in August 2019.
The DBP Act introduces a number of additional requirements, including requirements that building practitioners:
These changes are designed to prevent defective building work by ensuring building practitioners have increased duties to landowners, provide the certifications required to allow principal certifiers to issue occupation certificates, and have the necessary insurance to cover their liability if they breached their duties.
The RAB Act is designed to increase the governance framework to minimise defective residential apartments and inadequate certification process in residential apartments by:
The DBP Act was first introduced as a Bill to the NSW Parliament in late 2019 and, following over 70 amendments by the Government, Opposition and crossbench, passed the Parliament on 11 June 2020. Amendments included the mandatory registration of engineers. (Access further information about the draft legislation which was released in 2019.)
The most significant change made by the DBP Act is the imposition of a statutory duty of care on any person who carries out construction work.
Construction work is defined to include:
Practitioners involved in building design, building work, the manufacturing or supply of products used for building work and supervisory roles will be required to exercise reasonable care to avoid economic loss which would be caused by defects relating to, or arising from, construction work.
If a practitioner breaches this duty of care, a property owner will be entitled to damages (regardless of whether there is a contractual arrangement to carry out that construction work).
The duty of care cannot be delegated or contracted out, and it does not limit damages or other compensation that may be available where a breach of another duty occurs.
The duty of care will apply retrospectively to existing buildings and contracts, if the economic loss has become apparent within the last 10 years or after the DBP Act commenced. The duty of care also extends to subsequent owners.
The framework means that a principal certifier can only issue an occupation certificate after it has determined and obtained all compliance declarations for the building work. The compliance declarations can be only issued by registered practitioners at various levels of the building cycle.
The DBP Act requires the registration and regulation of design and principal design practitioners, building practitioners, professional engineers and specialist practitioners.
The DBP Act broadly defines building practitioners to include:
The broad nature of this definition means the vast majority of people engaged in building work will be required to register.
Under the registration regime, building practitioners will be required to register with the Department of Customer Service (the Department) and must be “adequately insured” before undertaking building work.
The DPB Act introduces the following concepts to implement the registration and compliance framework.
These new concepts facilitate a number of additional regulatory requirements, including requirements that:
In addition to the duty of care owed by the practitioners, the DBP Act also provides for enforcement through:
The DBP Act also makes numerous references to a regulatory scheme which is yet to come into effect. The proposed Regulations are anticipated to further detail:
The RAB Act is designed to:
To achieve these objectives, the RAB Act enables the Secretary to:
Under the RAB Act, a new defect category of ‘serious defect’ has been established, which includes:
The Act applies to ‘developers’, which is broadly defined by the Act to include:
The Act is scheduled to come into effect on 1 September 2020, and will apply to:
Regulations supporting the RAB Act are expected to be introduced later in July.
Developers can appeal stop work orders to the Land and Environment Court. However, this appeal must be lodged within 30 days of the notice of the order being given and, unless otherwise determined by the Court, will not operate to stay the stop work order.
To ensure the integrity of the residential apartment building industry, the RAB Act grants government a number of additional regulatory and enforcement powers including:
It is intended that the Secretary’s powers under the RAB Act will be delegated to the Building Commissioner.
Overall, it is hoped that both the DBP and RAB Acts will have the desired effect of reinstating investor and community confidence in the construction industry, particularly Class 2 building work, without excessive time delays and cost as a consequence.
Developers and builders will need to have regard to these regulatory and governance requirements in projects going forward.
There will be challenges for the design and building practitioners in particular, including ensuring they are adequately insured in a challenging professional indemnity insurance market.
Where developers have previously enjoyed a level of flexibility in relation to materials used or final designs, the new legislation will mean more rigour in the certification process and this will need to be factored into the whole planning and delivery project timeframe.
For existing and new projects, additional modifications to development consents may be required. Developers should consider the extent to which they are giving themselves sufficient flexibility where needed in documentation that will form part of consents and which will not fundamentally affect the design outcome.
It is difficult, at this stage, to foresee all of the potential implications of the RAB Act, but it does appear that there is a risk to developers of time and cost delays if vexatious claims are made regarding defective building works. Because of this, contingencies should be factored into development program timeframes, particularly for contentious projects.
Authors
Head of Environment and Planning
Head of Gender Equality
Tags
This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.
Head of Environment and Planning