06 October 2021
The Sydney Morning Herald reported in July 2021 that 42 of Australia’s 50 biggest companies have permanently adopted hybrid working arrangements for office-based employees, with a further six companies planning to implement flexible working policies where appropriate. A survey conducted by PWC in February 2021 revealed that a hybrid working environment is preferred by 60% of Australian workers.
Simple lease renewals and conventional fitouts are giving way to deals involving increased space flexibility, utilisation of versatile co-working or ‘third’ spaces in buildings and adaptability in fitout design and delivery. Tenants are achieving their post-COVID strategic planning requirements through either sourcing new space where they can start with a clean slate, or ‘staying put’ but collaborating with their landlords to bring forward lease negotiations, enabling them to right-size their space and fitout requirements, frequently in return for an extended lease term.
Commercial tenants are increasingly realising the benefits of versatile co-working spaces, also known as ‘third’ or ‘flex’ spaces. For landlords, having a dedicated co-working space in a building will only be commercially viable where there is significant tenant take up. The availability of co-working spaces in a building may influence the core leased office space required by a tenant, with critical considerations including:
Co-working spaces are emerging as a key building amenity and office space differentiator. They provide a valuable form of office ‘placemaking’ by providing a space that enhances wellbeing and productivity and brings together a broader community of businesses.
In the wake of the pandemic, more organisations will be looking to de-risk and rethink how they use office space by leasing and fitting out the organisation’s core space while utilising these collective spaces on an as needs basis, as an alternative to or in conjunction with incorporating expansion and contraction flexibility into leases.
As hybrid working and the growth of collective spaces in buildings paves the way for the potential to change space requirements, commercial tenants are seeing the need to incorporate space flexibility into their leasing deals. Some key mechanisms through which commercial tenants may implement space flexibility include:
the ability of the landlord to lease expansion space when not used by the tenant;
when the right may be exercised and the length of notice;
the condition of the premises and status of fitout;
the amount of additional or reduced rent and incentive; and
other higher ranking expansion rights granted by the landlord.
Space flexibility comes at a cost, as landlords need sufficient certainty to lease the balance of their buildings. Tenants will need to plan their space requirements carefully by reference to their organisation’s unique hybrid working behaviours.
Greater adaptability in fitout design and delivery are anticipated to become a feature in post-COVID builds to accommodate last minute modifications consequential on rapidly changing local conditions. This may lead to fewer integrated fitouts, as tenants seek to separate their ever-changing space requirements from base building specifications.
In the immediate future, developers may also seek to negotiate additional contingencies in anticipation of future COVID outbreaks. A further challenge arises in the context of regulatory and legislative change in relation to density and social distancing requirements.
The need for flexibility will impact on both the scope and nature of the works, and the delivery model / contract form. Adaptable fitout delivery and design is likely to require or allow for:
Fitout contracts will need to contain robust and carefully considered variation provisions to enable reconfiguration of design to adapt to changing circumstances, with close attention being paid to building in (and fixing) time and cost contingencies.
Tenants may seek closer involvement in, and more control over design outcomes, trade contractor selection and (to protect against insolvency risk) direct avenues of recourse to suppliers and subcontractors. Design and construct, which for many tenants is procured on a ‘set and forget’ basis, may give way to different structures, in particular managing contractors with a guaranteed maximum price, and tenants who want complete control may engage in construction management.
This article is part of our publication Continuity Beyond Crises: Staying ahead of risk in an evolving legal landscape. Read more here.
Authors
Partner
Lawyer
Tags
This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.