02 August 2021
The NSW Supreme Court has provided further guidance on what constitutes ‘genuine’ negotiations prior to the issue of a proposed acquisition notice in Elmasri v Transport for NSW [2021] NSWSC 929 (Elmasri).
Elmasri concerned the proposed compulsory acquisition of part of the land owned by the plaintiffs in Kemps Creek for the purposes of the M12 Project. The plaintiffs argued that Transport for NSW (TfNSW) failed to make a genuine attempt to acquire the land by agreement for a number of reasons, all of which were rejected by the Court.
Prior to compulsorily acquiring land or an interest in land in New South Wales, an acquiring authority must make a ‘genuine attempt to acquire the land by agreement for at least six months’, unless a shortened period is agreed.[1]
The negotiations must occur before the acquiring authority gives a notice of intention to acquire the land or interest in land by compulsory process, known as a proposed acquisition notice (PAN).
As section 10A is still a relatively new provision in the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1979 (Just Terms Act), to date, there has been limited case law on these pre-PAN negotiations.
The decision in Elmasri, involving difficult, expedited litigation, provides some additional guidance to acquiring authorities and affected interest-holders on what constitutes ‘genuine’ negotiations under section 10A.
The Court found that considering whether an acquiring authority has made a genuine attempt to acquire land for at least six months involves the following two-step process:
Importantly, the Court held that relying on genuine attempts to acquire the land by agreement by identifying any six-month period prior to giving the PAN does not satisfy section 10A(2), as it is necessary to consider the acquiring authority’s conduct during the entirety of the pre-PAN period.
Building on the existing case law on the meaning of a ‘genuine attempt’,[2] the Court held that an acquiring authority can be considered to have made a genuine attempt to acquire land by agreement even if it issues a PAN if negotiations fail, or in light of its acquisition timetable, particularly where the possibility of reaching agreement is remote.
Similarly, an acquiring authority can make a ‘genuine attempt’ to reach agreement even if its assessment of compensation is, ultimately, wrong (as determined by either the Valuer General’s compensation determination or Class 3 compensation proceedings).
The Court confirmed that section 10A requires acquiring authorities to negotiate on the quantification of the compensation payable under the heads of compensation, under section 55 of the Just Terms Act. It does not require acquiring authorities to negotiate on compensation outside of those heads of compensation.
Although the Court did not ultimately make a finding on this issue, the Court considered that section 10A(2) of the Just Terms Act appears to be a jurisdictional prerequisite to the acquiring authority having the power to issue a valid PAN.
In Elmasri, section 10A negotiations commenced with the issuing of an opening letter in August 2019. TfNSW then made three offers to acquire either part or the whole of the plaintiffs’ land in March, August and December 2020. The offers were based on advice from TfNSW’s external planning, valuation and environmental consultants. The PAN was issued in March 2021.
The plaintiffs argued TfNSW failed to make a genuine attempt to acquire their land by agreement for a number of reasons, all of which were rejected by the Court. The Court found that, when considering TfNSW’s pre-PAN conduct overall, TfNSW made a genuine attempt to acquire the land by agreement.
A summary of the concerns raised by the plaintiffs in relation to the pre-PAN negotiations is set out below.
[1] Section 10A(2) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW).
[2] See Roads and Maritime Services v Desane Properties Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 196 at [205], [258] and [269].
Authors
Head of Environment and Planning
Partner
Senior Associate
Associate
Tags
This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.
Head of Environment and Planning