21 November 2018
Despite the uncertainty as to when (if at all) an energy and fuel Royal Commission will proceed, stakeholders should be giving proper consideration to how a Royal Commission would run, what it could mean for them and what they need to do about it.
In the past decade, there have been significant increases to energy and fuel prices. Electricity prices have increased 56% across Australia from the 2007-2008 to 2017-2018 period[1] and 87% in Queensland from the 2006-2007 to 2015-2016 period.[2] Similarly, petrol prices have risen to a 10-year high in some parts of Australia.[3]
Several inquiries into electricity pricing have been conducted at both State and Federal level. In July this year the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued its final report on an inquiry into retail electricity prices. The final report indicated that energy prices are an ‘enormous strain on household budgets and business viability’[4] and made 56 recommendations to address this.
Off the back of the ACCC final report, Peter Dutton called for a Royal Commission into the energy sector and into fuel prices. Malcolm Turnbull did not back the establishment of a Royal Commission, but there appeared to be broad support for a Royal Commission in parliament.
Recently, however, Federal Energy Minister Angus Taylor indicated that a Royal Commission into the energy sector may not be required if everyone can ‘lift our game to deliver a better outcome for customers.’[5]
EnergyAustralia chief executive Catherine Tanna is now proposing a tripartite meeting between government, industry and the ACCC to address pricing, reliability and emission reductions.[6] Whether agreement can be reached however remains to be seen. Meanwhile, Scott Morrison has insisted that ‘the government will always be considering ways that we can put more pressure on petrol companies to do the right thing by customers, just like we are doing with electricity prices.’[7]
Despite the uncertainty as to when (if at all) a Royal Commission will proceed, stakeholders have begun seeking advice in preparation for an energy and fuel Royal Commission.[8] We consider that stakeholders should be giving real thought to how an energy and fuel Royal Commission would run, what it could mean for them and what they need to do about it.
It is key that the relevant stakeholders have a general understanding of what to expect from a Royal Commission to allow them to undertake the necessary preparations.
A Royal Commission is an inquisitorial process, which follows a different sequence to litigation in the Courts. The Commissioner will direct the areas of investigation and has wide discretion as to what to investigate, provided it is within the terms of reference, which will be released once the Royal Commission is formally established.
A Royal Commission has extensive powers, including the power to summon documents and witnesses to give evidence. Evidence given may not be used in criminal or civil proceedings against that witness but is otherwise able to be relied on more broadly (for example against an organisation).
In certain circumstances, legal professional privilege can be asserted as a ‘reasonable excuse’ to refuse the production of documents and evidence in response to a summons however timeframes to claim privilege are tight. It is usual for a Royal Commission to issue a practice note indicating how it will deal with privilege.
At the conclusion of the hearing the Commissioner will make findings, which are delivered to the Government and made public once they are tabled in Parliament.
It is key that the relevant stakeholders have a general understanding of what to expect from a Royal Commission to allow them to undertake the necessary preparations.
The ACCC report and the general political climate regarding electricity pricing gives some indication on what an energy Royal Commission is likely to consider. Specifically with regard to the Queensland Government, the ACCC considers that the generation market has been allowed to become too concentrated and recommended that generation assets should be divided into three separately owned portfolios to increase competition.[9]
Network operators have also been targeted as major contributors to electricity price increases. The ACCC primarily attributes that to over-investment in state-owned networks due to excessive reliability standards and recommends that state governments (including Queensland) write-down the regulatory asset base of those networks.[10]
Privatisation is also likely to be a key feature regarding networks with highly contentious views as to the benefits and pitfalls of deregulation and privatisation.[11]The Queensland model is likely to be reviewed in great detail against the models used by privatised states such as Victoria.
Subsidy schemes for solar and other low emission technologies that were introduced in order to meet the renewable energy target are also likely to be reviewed, along with various other topics such as the behaviours and pricing structures of electricity retailers.
Calls for a Royal Commission into fuel prices have largely centred around arguments that fuel prices are inflated either because the profit margins of fuel retailers are too high or the retail fuel market is overly concentrated by a small number of large retailers. Accordingly, these issues are likely to be the focus of any Royal Commission into fuel prices.
In the meantime, there have been calls for the government to consider addressing these issues by cutting the fuel excise or for the forced divestiture of petrol companies.[12]
Notably, the ACCC has recently confirmed its position that recent increases in petrol price have been ‘clearly driven by overseas oil prices and the exchange rate’, rather than any other factors.[13]
If it is to proceed, an energy and fuel Royal Commission is unlikely to be established prior to the federal election next year.
We expect that the Royal Commission, if established, is likely to proceed with pace and certain preparatory measures should be taken now to ensure that any requirements of the Royal Commission are capable of being performed in a timely manner. Specifically, attention should be given to the following areas:
Having these areas under control will allow for the smooth transition into the more substantive preparation required once the terms of reference are announced.
Further, these steps are not overly burdensome and would likely outweigh the cost or business disruption that they might cause.
[1] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. June 2018. Restoring electricity affordability and Australia’s competitive advantage Retail Electricity Pricing Inquiry – Final Report, Executive Summary at page v (available at –
[2] Queensland Productivity Commission. 31 May 2016. Electricity Pricing Inquiry, Executive Summary at page vi
[3] The Guardian. 30 October 2018. Petrol prices: Craig Kelly pushes Coalition to consider $3.5bn reduction in excise tax.
[4] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. June 2018. Restoring electricity affordability and Australia’s competitive advantage Retail Electricity Pricing Inquiry – Final Report, Executive Summary at page iv (available at - https://www.accc.gov.au/publications/retail-electricity-pricing-inquiry-final-report-executive-summary )
[5] Australian (Newspaper). 11 October 2018. Minister goes cool on energy inquiry.
[6] Australian Financial Review. 13 October 2018. Energy chief in policy action push.
[7] The Australian Financial Review. 1 November 2018. ACCC can't do much on petrol prices
[8] Australian Financial Review. 19 September 2018. Power, gas companies scouting lawyers.
[9] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. June 2018. Restoring electricity affordability and Australia’s competitive advantage Retail Electricity Pricing Inquiry – Final Report, Executive Summary at page vi – viii (available at - https://www.accc.gov.au/public...)
[10] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. June 2018. Restoring electricity affordability and Australia’s competitive advantage Retail Electricity Pricing Inquiry – Final Report, Executive Summary at page ix – x (available at - https://www.accc.gov.au/public...)
[11] See for example: The Greens (Media Release). 10 July 2018. Greens launch push for parliamentary commission of inquiry into the failures of deregulation and privatisation of electricity retailers (available at - https://greensmps.org.au/artic...) as opposed to the views expressed by the ACCC Report and the Harper Review
[12] The Guardian. 20 October 2018. Petrol prices: Craig Kelly pushes Coalition to consider $3.5bn reduction in excise tax
[13] The Guardian. 31 October 2018. Consumer watchdog dismisses Coalition calls to break up fuel companies.
Authors
Partner
Partner
Tags
This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.